[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210607090435.GA10960@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:04:35 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
Cc: steffen.klassert@...unet.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xfrm: use BUG_ON instead of if condition
followed by BUG
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 05:11:21PM +0800, Zheng Yongjun wrote:
> Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
>
> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index ce500f847b99..532314578151 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -421,8 +421,7 @@ void xfrm_policy_destroy(struct xfrm_policy *policy)
> {
> BUG_ON(!policy->walk.dead);
>
> - if (del_timer(&policy->timer) || del_timer(&policy->polq.hold_timer))
> - BUG();
> + BUG_ON(del_timer(&policy->timer) || del_timer(&policy->polq.hold_timer));
Nack. Do not put statements with side effects within BUG_ON.
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists