linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Introduce pcim_alloc_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 12:09:20 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>
Cc:     helgaas@...nel.org, corbet@....net, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, rric@...nel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors()

On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 03:05:07PM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> Introduce pcim_alloc_irq_vectors(), a device-managed version of
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors(), In some i2c drivers, If pcim_enable_device()
> has been called before, then pci_alloc_irq_vectors() is actually a
> device-managed function. It is used as a device-managed function, So
> replace it with pcim_alloc_irq_vectors().

Thanks!

> Changelog
> ---------
> v5 -> v6:
> 	- rebase to 5.13-rc4

It's already rc5 and I believe you better use the subsystem tree against which
your series is (i.e. PCI for-next or how it is called there).

Besides that kbuild bot is not happy.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko