linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Remove MV64x60 watchdog driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 04:29:50 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Remove MV64x60 watchdog driver

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 11:43:26AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:
> > On 5/17/21 4:17 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> writes:
> >>> On 3/18/21 10:25 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>>> Commit 92c8c16f3457 ("powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove C2K board support")
> >>>> removed the last selector of CONFIG_MV64X60.
> >>>>
> >>>> Therefore CONFIG_MV64X60_WDT cannot be selected anymore and
> >>>> can be removed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>   drivers/watchdog/Kconfig       |   4 -
> >>>>   drivers/watchdog/Makefile      |   1 -
> >>>>   drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c | 324 ---------------------------------
> >>>>   include/linux/mv643xx.h        |   8 -
> >>>>   4 files changed, 337 deletions(-)
> >>>>   delete mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c
> >> 
> >> I assumed this would go via the watchdog tree, but seems like I
> >> misinterpreted.
> >> 
> >
> > Wim didn't send a pull request this time around.
> >
> > Guenter
> >
> >> Should I take this via the powerpc tree for v5.14 ?
> 
> I still don't see this in the watchdog tree, should I take it?
> 
It is in my personal watchdog-next tree, but afaics Wim hasn't picked any
of it up yet. Wim ?

Thanks,
Guenter