[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210607121524.GB3896@www>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 05:15:24 -0700
From: menglong8.dong@...il.com
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, johan@...nel.org,
ojeda@...nel.org, jeyu@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
joe@...ches.com, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, hare@...e.de,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, tj@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, song@...nel.org,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>, f.fainelli@...il.com,
palmerdabbelt@...gle.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, vbabka@...e.cz,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, pmladek@...e.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, jojing64@...il.com,
terrelln@...com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, arnd@...db.de,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>, mingo@...nel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] init/do_mounts.c: create second mount for
initramfs
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:31:47PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 10:47:07PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote:
[...]
> >
> > I think it's necessary, as I explained in the third patch. When the rootfs
> > is a block device, ramfs is used in init_mount_tree() unconditionally,
> > which can be seen from the enable of is_tmpfs.
> >
> > That makes sense, because rootfs will not become the root if a block
> > device is specified by 'root' in boot cmd, so it makes no sense to use
> > tmpfs, because ramfs is more simple.
> >
> > Here, I make rootfs as ramfs for the same reason: the first mount is not
> > used as the root, so make it ramfs which is more simple.
>
> Ok. If you don't mind I'd like to pull and test this before moving
> further. (Btw, I talked about this at Plumbers before btw.)
> What did you use for testing this? Any way you can share it?
Ok, no problem definitely. I tested this function in 3 way mainly:
1. I debug the kernel with qemu and gdb, and trace the the whole
process, to ensure that there is no abnormal situation.
2. I tested pivot_root() in initramfs and ensured that it can be
used normally. What's more, I also tested docker and ensured
container can run normally without 'DOCKER_RAMDISK=yes' set in
initramfs.
3. I tried to enable and disable CONFIG_INITRAMFS_MOUNT, and
ensured that the system can boot successfully from initramfs, initrd
and sda.
What's more, our team is going to test it comprehensively, such as
ltp, etc.
Thanks!
Menglong Dong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists