linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of acpi device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:52:43 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] ACPI: scan: Add function to fetch dependent of
 acpi device

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 12:41 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>
> In some ACPI tables we encounter, devices use the _DEP method to assert
> a dependence on other ACPI devices as opposed to the OpRegions that the
> specification intends. We need to be able to find those devices "from"
> the dependee, so add a callback and a wrapper to walk over the
> acpi_dep_list and return the dependent ACPI device.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes since v5:
>
>         - Functions renamed
>
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c     | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 195635c3462b..9af64c34e286 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -2105,6 +2105,20 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device, bool first_pass)
>                 device->handler->hotplug.notify_online(device);
>  }
>
> +static int acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_device *adev;
> +
> +       adev = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(dep->consumer);
> +       if (!adev)
> +               /* If we don't find an adev then we want to continue parsing */
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       *(struct acpi_device **)data = adev;
> +
> +       return 1;
> +}
> +
>  static int acpi_scan_clear_dep(struct acpi_dep_data *dep, void *data)
>  {
>         struct acpi_device *adev;
> @@ -2168,6 +2182,27 @@ void acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(struct acpi_device *supplier)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_clear_dependencies);
>
> +/**
> + * acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev - Return ACPI device dependent on @supplier
> + * @supplier: Pointer to the dependee device
> + *
> + * Returns the first &struct acpi_device which declares itself dependent on
> + * @supplier via the _DEP buffer, parsed from the acpi_dep_list.
> + *
> + * The caller is responsible for putting the reference to adev when it is no
> + * longer needed.
> + */
> +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev(struct acpi_device *supplier)
> +{
> +       struct acpi_device *adev = NULL;
> +
> +       acpi_walk_dep_device_list(supplier->handle,
> +                                 acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev_cb, &adev);
> +
> +       return adev;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev);
> +
>  /**
>   * acpi_bus_scan - Add ACPI device node objects in a given namespace scope.
>   * @handle: Root of the namespace scope to scan.
> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> index 0b2c4f170f4d..4bed30e61c5b 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> @@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static inline bool acpi_device_can_poweroff(struct acpi_device *adev)
>  bool acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid2, const char *uid2);
>
>  void acpi_dev_clear_dependencies(struct acpi_device *supplier);
> +struct acpi_device *acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev(struct acpi_device *supplier);
>  struct acpi_device *
>  acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid, const char *uid, s64 hrv);
>  struct acpi_device *
> --

Applied as 5.14 material along the [1/6].

I'll expose a branch containing the 2 patches to pull from later this week.

Thanks!