lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YL45XRsvI5ZGY1Kq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 7 Jun 2021 17:21:01 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/34] docs: x86: avoid using ReSt :doc:`foo` markup

On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:18:33PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py.
> So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>

Thanks!

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>

> ---
>  Documentation/x86/boot.rst | 4 ++--
>  Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> index fc844913dece..894a19897005 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/boot.rst
> @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@ follow::
>  In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct
>  boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should
>  also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as
> -described in chapter :doc:`zero-page`.
> +described in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst.
>  
>  After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load the
>  32/64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol.
> @@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ can be calculated as follows::
>  In addition to read/modify/write the setup header of the struct
>  boot_params as that of 16-bit boot protocol, the boot loader should
>  also fill the additional fields of the struct boot_params as described
> -in chapter :doc:`zero-page`.
> +in chapter Documentation/x86/zero-page.rst.
>  
>  After setting up the struct boot_params, the boot loader can load
>  64-bit kernel in the same way as that of 16-bit boot protocol, but
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
> index c5b695d75349..9f0b1851771a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/mtrr.rst
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ are aligned with platform MTRR setup. If MTRRs are only set up by the platform
>  firmware code though and the OS does not make any specific MTRR mapping
>  requests mtrr_type_lookup() should always return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID.
>  
> -For details refer to :doc:`pat`.
> +For details refer to Documentation/x86/pat.rst.
>  
>  .. tip::
>    On Intel P6 family processors (Pentium Pro, Pentium II and later)
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ