linux-kernel - Re: [Backport for linux-5.4.y PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP2+: Prepare timer code to backport dra7 timer wrap errata i940

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:13:30 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Backport for linux-5.4.y PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP2+: Prepare timer
 code to backport dra7 timer wrap errata i940

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:46:23PM +0300, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Prepare linux-5.4.y to backport upstream timer wrap errata commit
> 3efe7a878a11c13b5297057bfc1e5639ce1241ce and commit
> 25de4ce5ed02994aea8bc111d133308f6fd62566. Earlier kernels still use
> mach-omap2/timer instead of drivers/clocksource as these kernels still
> depend on legacy platform code for timers. Note that earlier stable
> kernels need also additional patches and will be posted separately.

I do not understand this paragraph.

What upstream commit is this?  And "posted separately" shouldn't show up
in a changelog text, right?

Can you fix this up to make this obvious what is happening here and make
a patch series that I can take without editing changelog text?

thanks,

greg k-h