lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YL+rEhU4A1tXNFYO@zn.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:38:26 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/cpu 4/4] Warning: Kernel ABI header at
 'tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h' differs from latest version at
 'arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h':  111< /* free                                    (
 3*32+29) */

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 02:07:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Apply the patch, try to build it, it doesn't matter where you build it,
> only that after applying the patch I want to know if it doersn't build,
> so that I can look at it earlier than when it gets to my attention by
> merging upstream, etc.

I believe if you give the 0day guys a step-by-step what to do, they'll
probably add it to the lineup. :)

> We're doing it already, Peter wants to help me with it, and I think this
> has value.

Or, if we start doing that then they don't have to do anything.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ