| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210608175931.369868233@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:27:10 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 27/47] bpf, selftests: Fix up some test_verifier cases for unprivileged
From: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>
commit 0a13e3537ea67452d549a6a80da3776d6b7dedb3 upstream.
Fix up test_verifier error messages for the case where the original error
message changed, or for the case where pointer alu errors differ between
privileged and unprivileged tests. Also, add alternative tests for keeping
coverage of the original verifier rejection error message (fp alu), and
newly reject map_ptr += rX where rX == 0 given we now forbid alu on these
types for unprivileged. All test_verifier cases pass after the change. The
test case fixups were kept separate to ease backporting of core changes.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
[fllinden@...zon.com: backport to 4.14, skipping non-existent tests]
Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -2235,7 +2235,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
- "unpriv: adding of fp",
+ "unpriv: adding of fp, reg",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
@@ -2243,9 +2243,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = ACCEPT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "unpriv: adding of fp, imm",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
.errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"unpriv: cmp of stack pointer",
@@ -7766,8 +7779,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
.errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
+ .result = REJECT,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 2",
@@ -7780,6 +7794,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
@@ -7790,8 +7806,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
.errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
+ .result = REJECT,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 4",
@@ -7804,6 +7821,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
@@ -7814,8 +7833,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
.errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
+ .result = REJECT,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 6",
@@ -7826,8 +7846,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
.errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
+ .result = REJECT,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 7",
@@ -7839,8 +7860,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
+ .result = REJECT,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 8",
@@ -7852,8 +7874,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 tried to add from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
+ .result = REJECT,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 9",
@@ -7863,8 +7886,9 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 tried to sub from different maps, paths, or prohibited types",
.errstr = "R0 tried to subtract pointer from scalar",
+ .result = REJECT,
},
{
"check deducing bounds from const, 10",
@@ -7876,8 +7900,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .result = REJECT,
.errstr = "math between ctx pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed",
+ .result = REJECT,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end <= pkt_data', bad access 2",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists