| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210608175933.791780772@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:27:27 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 46/58] bpf: Apply F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to more ACCEPT test cases.
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
commit 0a68632488aa0129ed530af9ae9e8573f5650812 upstream
If a testcase has alignment problems but is expected to be ACCEPT,
verify it using F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS too.
Maybe in the future if we add some architecture specific code to elide
the unaligned memory access warnings during the test, we can execute
these as well.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -3787,6 +3787,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test21 (x += pkt_ptr, 2)",
@@ -3812,6 +3813,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test22 (x += pkt_ptr, 3)",
@@ -3842,6 +3844,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test23 (x += pkt_ptr, 4)",
@@ -3894,6 +3897,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"direct packet access: test25 (marking on <, good access)",
@@ -6957,6 +6961,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.retval = 0 /* csum_diff of 64-byte packet */,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"helper access to variable memory: size = 0 not allowed on NULL (!ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL)",
@@ -8923,6 +8928,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' > pkt_end, bad access 1",
@@ -9094,6 +9100,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end < pkt_data', bad access 1",
@@ -9206,6 +9213,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_end >= pkt_data', bad access 1",
@@ -9263,6 +9271,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data' <= pkt_end, bad access 1",
@@ -9375,6 +9384,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' > pkt_data, bad access 1",
@@ -9546,6 +9556,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data < pkt_meta', bad access 1",
@@ -9658,6 +9669,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_data >= pkt_meta', bad access 1",
@@ -9715,6 +9727,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1",
@@ -11646,6 +11659,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 1,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 4",
@@ -11680,6 +11694,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 1,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 5",
@@ -11825,6 +11840,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
+ .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
},
{
"calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack 9",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists