[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210608175937.795560094@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:27:44 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>,
Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
Yann Collet <yann.collet.73@...il.com>,
Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
Li Guifu <bluce.liguifu@...wei.com>,
Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 75/78] lib/lz4: explicitly support in-place decompression
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>
commit 89b158635ad79574bde8e94d45dad33f8cf09549 upstream.
LZ4 final literal copy could be overlapped when doing
in-place decompression, so it's unsafe to just use memcpy()
on an optimized memcpy approach but memmove() instead.
Upstream LZ4 has updated this years ago [1] (and the impact
is non-sensible [2] plus only a few bytes remain), this commit
just synchronizes LZ4 upstream code to the kernel side as well.
It can be observed as EROFS in-place decompression failure
on specific files when X86_FEATURE_ERMS is unsupported,
memcpy() optimization of commit 59daa706fbec ("x86, mem:
Optimize memcpy by avoiding memory false dependece") will
be enabled then.
Currently most modern x86-CPUs support ERMS, these CPUs just
use "rep movsb" approach so no problem at all. However, it can
still be verified with forcely disabling ERMS feature...
arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:
ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp memcpy_orig", "", X86_FEATURE_REP_GOOD, \
- "jmp memcpy_erms", X86_FEATURE_ERMS
+ "jmp memcpy_orig", X86_FEATURE_ERMS
We didn't observe any strange on arm64/arm/x86 platform before
since most memcpy() would behave in an increasing address order
("copy upwards" [3]) and it's the correct order of in-place
decompression but it really needs an update to memmove() for sure
considering it's an undefined behavior according to the standard
and some unique optimization already exists in the kernel.
[1] https://github.com/lz4/lz4/commit/33cb8518ac385835cc17be9a770b27b40cd0e15b
[2] https://github.com/lz4/lz4/pull/717#issuecomment-497818921
[3] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12518
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201122030749.2698994-1-hsiangkao@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>
Cc: Yann Collet <yann.collet.73@...il.com>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: Li Guifu <bluce.liguifu@...wei.com>
Cc: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
lib/lz4/lz4_decompress.c | 6 +++++-
lib/lz4/lz4defs.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/lib/lz4/lz4_decompress.c
+++ b/lib/lz4/lz4_decompress.c
@@ -260,7 +260,11 @@ static FORCE_INLINE int LZ4_decompress_g
}
}
- memcpy(op, ip, length);
+ /*
+ * supports overlapping memory regions; only matters
+ * for in-place decompression scenarios
+ */
+ LZ4_memmove(op, ip, length);
ip += length;
op += length;
--- a/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h
+++ b/lib/lz4/lz4defs.h
@@ -137,6 +137,8 @@ static FORCE_INLINE void LZ4_writeLE16(v
return put_unaligned_le16(value, memPtr);
}
+#define LZ4_memmove(dst, src, size) __builtin_memmove(dst, src, size)
+
static FORCE_INLINE void LZ4_copy8(void *dst, const void *src)
{
#if LZ4_ARCH64
Powered by blists - more mailing lists