linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 070/137] tipc: fix unique bearer names sanity check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210608175944.728135053@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  8 Jun 2021 20:26:50 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>,
        Hoang Le <hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 070/137] tipc: fix unique bearer names sanity check

From: Hoang Le <hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au>

[ Upstream commit f20a46c3044c3f75232b3d0e2d09af9b25efaf45 ]

When enabling a bearer by name, we don't sanity check its name with
higher slot in bearer list. This may have the effect that the name
of an already enabled bearer bypasses the check.

To fix the above issue, we just perform an extra checking with all
existing bearers.

Fixes: cb30a63384bc9 ("tipc: refactor function tipc_enable_bearer()")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hoang Le <hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/tipc/bearer.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/bearer.c b/net/tipc/bearer.c
index 4d0e11623e5c..12e535b43d88 100644
--- a/net/tipc/bearer.c
+++ b/net/tipc/bearer.c
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static int tipc_enable_bearer(struct net *net, const char *name,
 	int bearer_id = 0;
 	int res = -EINVAL;
 	char *errstr = "";
+	u32 i;
 
 	if (!bearer_name_validate(name, &b_names)) {
 		errstr = "illegal name";
@@ -270,31 +271,38 @@ static int tipc_enable_bearer(struct net *net, const char *name,
 		prio = m->priority;
 
 	/* Check new bearer vs existing ones and find free bearer id if any */
-	while (bearer_id < MAX_BEARERS) {
-		b = rtnl_dereference(tn->bearer_list[bearer_id]);
-		if (!b)
-			break;
+	bearer_id = MAX_BEARERS;
+	i = MAX_BEARERS;
+	while (i-- != 0) {
+		b = rtnl_dereference(tn->bearer_list[i]);
+		if (!b) {
+			bearer_id = i;
+			continue;
+		}
 		if (!strcmp(name, b->name)) {
 			errstr = "already enabled";
 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Already enabled");
 			goto rejected;
 		}
-		bearer_id++;
-		if (b->priority != prio)
-			continue;
-		if (++with_this_prio <= 2)
-			continue;
-		pr_warn("Bearer <%s>: already 2 bearers with priority %u\n",
-			name, prio);
-		if (prio == TIPC_MIN_LINK_PRI) {
-			errstr = "cannot adjust to lower";
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Cannot adjust to lower");
-			goto rejected;
+
+		if (b->priority == prio &&
+		    (++with_this_prio > 2)) {
+			pr_warn("Bearer <%s>: already 2 bearers with priority %u\n",
+				name, prio);
+
+			if (prio == TIPC_MIN_LINK_PRI) {
+				errstr = "cannot adjust to lower";
+				NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Cannot adjust to lower");
+				goto rejected;
+			}
+
+			pr_warn("Bearer <%s>: trying with adjusted priority\n",
+				name);
+			prio--;
+			bearer_id = MAX_BEARERS;
+			i = MAX_BEARERS;
+			with_this_prio = 1;
 		}
-		pr_warn("Bearer <%s>: trying with adjusted priority\n", name);
-		prio--;
-		bearer_id = 0;
-		with_this_prio = 1;
 	}
 
 	if (bearer_id >= MAX_BEARERS) {
-- 
2.30.2