[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210608175946.266983139@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:25:54 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 024/161] mptcp: fix sk_forward_memory corruption on retransmission
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit b5941f066b4ca331db225a976dae1d6ca8cf0ae3 ]
MPTCP sk_forward_memory handling is a bit special, as such field
is protected by the msk socket spin_lock, instead of the plain
socket lock.
Currently we have a code path updating such field without handling
the relevant lock:
__mptcp_retrans() -> __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup()
Several helpers in __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup() will update
sk_forward_alloc, possibly causing such field corruption, as reported
by Matthieu.
Address the issue providing and using a new variant of blamed function
which explicitly acquires the msk spin lock.
Fixes: 64b9cea7a0af ("mptcp: fix spurious retransmissions")
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/172
Reported-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Tested-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 228dd40828c4..225b98821517 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -937,6 +937,10 @@ static void __mptcp_update_wmem(struct sock *sk)
{
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!lockdep_is_held(&sk->sk_lock.slock));
+#endif
+
if (!msk->wmem_reserved)
return;
@@ -1075,10 +1079,20 @@ out:
static void __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!lockdep_is_held(&sk->sk_lock.slock));
+#endif
__mptcp_clean_una(sk);
mptcp_write_space(sk);
}
+static void mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
+{
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
+ __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
+}
+
static void mptcp_enter_memory_pressure(struct sock *sk)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
@@ -2288,7 +2302,7 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
struct sock *ssk;
int ret;
- __mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
+ mptcp_clean_una_wakeup(sk);
dfrag = mptcp_rtx_head(sk);
if (!dfrag) {
if (mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk)) {
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists