linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 139/161] powerpc/kprobes: Fix validation of prefixed instructions across page boundary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210608175950.145668740@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  8 Jun 2021 20:27:49 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 139/161] powerpc/kprobes: Fix validation of prefixed instructions across page boundary

From: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

commit 82123a3d1d5a306fdf50c968a474cc60fe43a80f upstream.

When checking if the probed instruction is the suffix of a prefixed
instruction, we access the instruction at the previous word. If the
probed instruction is the very first word of a module, we can end up
trying to access an invalid page.

Fix this by skipping the check for all instructions at the beginning of
a page. Prefixed instructions cannot cross a 64-byte boundary and as
such, we don't expect to encounter a suffix as the very first word in a
page for kernel text. Even if there are prefixed instructions crossing
a page boundary (from a module, for instance), the instruction will be
illegal, so preventing probing on the suffix of such prefix instructions
isn't worthwhile.

Fixes: b4657f7650ba ("powerpc/kprobes: Don't allow breakpoints on suffixes")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.8+
Reported-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0df9a032a05576a2fa8e97d1b769af2ff0eafbd6.1621416666.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct kprobe *prev;
 	struct ppc_inst insn = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)p->addr);
-	struct ppc_inst prefix = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)(p->addr - 1));
 
 	if ((unsigned long)p->addr & 0x03) {
 		printk("Attempt to register kprobe at an unaligned address\n");
@@ -116,7 +115,8 @@ int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p
 	} else if (IS_MTMSRD(insn) || IS_RFID(insn) || IS_RFI(insn)) {
 		printk("Cannot register a kprobe on rfi/rfid or mtmsr[d]\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
-	} else if (ppc_inst_prefixed(prefix)) {
+	} else if ((unsigned long)p->addr & ~PAGE_MASK &&
+		   ppc_inst_prefixed(ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)(p->addr - 1)))) {
 		printk("Cannot register a kprobe on the second word of prefixed instruction\n");
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 	}