| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <b8734d24-715c-46b3-ac70-e9c7c845a01b@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:52:24 +0930
From: "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To: "Steven Lee" <steven_lee@...eedtech.com>
Cc: "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT"
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hongwei Zhang" <Hongweiz@....com>,
"Ryan Chen" <ryan_chen@...eedtech.com>,
"Billy Tsai" <billy_tsai@...eedtech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add AST2600 sgpio support
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021, at 12:20, Steven Lee wrote:
> The 06/08/2021 07:43, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2021, at 16:45, Steven Lee wrote:
> > > AST2600 SoC has 2 SGPIO master interfaces one with 128 pins another one
> > > with 80 pins.
> > > In the current driver, the maximum number of gpio pins of SoC is hardcoded
> > > as 80 and the gpio pin count mask for GPIO Configuration register is
> > > hardcode as GENMASK(9,6). In addition, some functions use the hardcoded
> > > value to calculate the gpio offset.
> > > The patch adds ast2600 compatibles and platform data that includes the
> > > max number of gpio pins supported by ast2600 and gpio pin count mask for
> > > GPIO Configuration register.
> > > The patch also modifies some functions to pass aspeed_sgpio struct for
> > > calculating gpio offset without using the hardcoded value.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Lee <steven_lee@...eedtech.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c
> > > index 64e54f8c30d2..8b893356f0ca 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c
> > > @@ -35,12 +35,18 @@
> > > #define ASPEED_SGPIO_CLK_DIV_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> > > #define ASPEED_SGPIO_ENABLE BIT(0)
> > >
> > > +struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata {
> > > + const u32 pin_mask;
> > > + int max_ngpios;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > struct aspeed_sgpio {
> > > struct gpio_chip chip;
> > > struct clk *pclk;
> > > spinlock_t lock;
> > > void __iomem *base;
> > > int irq;
> > > + int max_ngpios;
> > > int n_sgpio;
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -75,7 +81,13 @@ static const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank
> > > aspeed_sgpio_banks[] = {
> > > .val_regs = 0x0038,
> > > .rdata_reg = 0x0078,
> > > .irq_regs = 0x003C,
> > > - .names = { "I", "J" },
> > > + .names = { "I", "J", "K", "L" },
> > > + },
> > > + {
> > > + .val_regs = 0x0090,
> > > + .rdata_reg = 0x007C,
> > > + .irq_regs = 0x0094,
> > > + .names = { "M", "N", "O", "P" },
> > > },
> > > };
> > >
> > > @@ -121,15 +133,15 @@ static void __iomem *bank_reg(struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > -#define GPIO_BANK(x) ((x % SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET) >> 5)
> > > -#define GPIO_OFFSET(x) ((x % SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET) & 0x1f)
> > > -#define GPIO_BIT(x) BIT(GPIO_OFFSET(x))
> > > +#define GPIO_BANK(x, gpio) ((x % (gpio)->max_ngpios) >> 5)
> >
> > I couldn't stop myself from commenting on this: The 'context' parameter should be first (by convention), so:
> >
> > #define GPIO_BANK(gpio, x) ((x % (gpio)->max_ngpios) >> 5)
> >
> > There's another fix necessary here too - the x needs to be parenthesised:
> >
> > #define GPIO_BANK(gpio, x) (((x) % (gpio)->max_ngpios) >> 5)
> >
> > > +#define GPIO_OFFSET(x) ((x) & GENMASK(4, 0))
> > > +#define GPIO_BIT(x, gpio) BIT(GPIO_OFFSET(x % (gpio)->max_ngpios))
> >
> > Again, put the context parameter first. And again we should add the parentheses around x in the expression.
> >
> > >
> > > -static const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *to_bank(unsigned int offset)
> > > +static const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *to_bank(unsigned int offset,
> > > const struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio)
> > > {
> > > unsigned int bank;
> > >
> > > - bank = GPIO_BANK(offset);
> > > + bank = GPIO_BANK(offset, gpio);
> > >
> > > WARN_ON(bank >= ARRAY_SIZE(aspeed_sgpio_banks));
> > > return &aspeed_sgpio_banks[bank];
> > > @@ -139,18 +151,19 @@ static int aspeed_sgpio_init_valid_mask(struct
> > > gpio_chip *gc,
> > > unsigned long *valid_mask, unsigned int ngpios)
> > > {
> > > struct aspeed_sgpio *sgpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > > + int max_ngpios = sgpio->max_ngpios;
> > > int n = sgpio->n_sgpio;
> > > - int c = SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET - n;
> > > + int c = max_ngpios - n;
> > >
> > > - WARN_ON(ngpios < MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO * 2);
> > > + WARN_ON(ngpios < max_ngpios * 2);
> > >
> > > /* input GPIOs in the lower range */
> > > bitmap_set(valid_mask, 0, n);
> > > bitmap_clear(valid_mask, n, c);
> > >
> > > - /* output GPIOS above SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET */
> > > - bitmap_set(valid_mask, SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET, n);
> > > - bitmap_clear(valid_mask, SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET + n, c);
> > > + /* output GPIOS above max_ngpios */
> > > + bitmap_set(valid_mask, max_ngpios, n);
> > > + bitmap_clear(valid_mask, max_ngpios + n, c);
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -161,30 +174,30 @@ static void
> > > aspeed_sgpio_irq_init_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > > struct aspeed_sgpio *sgpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > > int n = sgpio->n_sgpio;
> > >
> > > - WARN_ON(ngpios < MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO * 2);
> > > + WARN_ON(ngpios < sgpio->max_ngpios * 2);
> > >
> > > /* input GPIOs in the lower range */
> > > bitmap_set(valid_mask, 0, n);
> > > bitmap_clear(valid_mask, n, ngpios - n);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static bool aspeed_sgpio_is_input(unsigned int offset)
> > > +static bool aspeed_sgpio_is_input(unsigned int offset, const struct
> > > aspeed_sgpio *gpio)
> > > {
> > > - return offset < SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET;
> > > + return offset < gpio->max_ngpios;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int aspeed_sgpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> > > {
> > > struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > > - const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset);
> > > + const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset, gpio);
> > > unsigned long flags;
> > > enum aspeed_sgpio_reg reg;
> > > int rc = 0;
> > >
> > > spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio->lock, flags);
> > >
> > > - reg = aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset) ? reg_val : reg_rdata;
> > > - rc = !!(ioread32(bank_reg(gpio, bank, reg)) & GPIO_BIT(offset));
> > > + reg = aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset, gpio) ? reg_val : reg_rdata;
> > > + rc = !!(ioread32(bank_reg(gpio, bank, reg)) & GPIO_BIT(offset, gpio));
> > >
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio->lock, flags);
> > >
> > > @@ -194,11 +207,11 @@ static int aspeed_sgpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > > unsigned int offset)
> > > static int sgpio_set_value(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
> > > int val)
> > > {
> > > struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > > - const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset);
> > > + const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset, gpio);
> > > void __iomem *addr_r, *addr_w;
> > > u32 reg = 0;
> > >
> > > - if (aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset))
> > > + if (aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset, gpio))
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > /* Since this is an output, read the cached value from rdata, then
> > > @@ -209,9 +222,9 @@ static int sgpio_set_value(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > > unsigned int offset, int val)
> > > reg = ioread32(addr_r);
> > >
> > > if (val)
> > > - reg |= GPIO_BIT(offset);
> > > + reg |= GPIO_BIT(offset, gpio);
> > > else
> > > - reg &= ~GPIO_BIT(offset);
> > > + reg &= ~GPIO_BIT(offset, gpio);
> > >
> > > iowrite32(reg, addr_w);
> > >
> > > @@ -232,7 +245,9 @@ static void aspeed_sgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > > unsigned int offset, int val)
> > >
> > > static int aspeed_sgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> > > {
> > > - return aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > > + struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > > +
> > > + return aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset, gpio) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int aspeed_sgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int
> > > offset, int val)
> > > @@ -253,7 +268,9 @@ static int aspeed_sgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip
> > > *gc, unsigned int offset, int v
> > >
> > > static int aspeed_sgpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned
> > > int offset)
> > > {
> > > - return !!aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset);
> > > + struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > > +
> > > + return !!aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset, gpio);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void irqd_to_aspeed_sgpio_data(struct irq_data *d,
> > > @@ -268,8 +285,8 @@ static void irqd_to_aspeed_sgpio_data(struct irq_data *d,
> > > WARN_ON(!internal);
> > >
> > > *gpio = internal;
> > > - *bank = to_bank(*offset);
> > > - *bit = GPIO_BIT(*offset);
> > > + *bank = to_bank(*offset, internal);
> > > + *bit = GPIO_BIT(*offset, internal);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void aspeed_sgpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> > > @@ -466,9 +483,21 @@ static int aspeed_sgpio_setup_irqs(struct
> > > aspeed_sgpio *gpio,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static const struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata ast2600_sgpiom_128_pdata = {
> > > + .max_ngpios = 128,
> > > + .pin_mask = GENMASK(10, 6),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata ast2600_sgpiom_80_pdata = {
> > > + .max_ngpios = 80,
> > > + .pin_mask = GENMASK(10, 6),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static const struct of_device_id aspeed_sgpio_of_table[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-sgpio" },
> > > { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-sgpio" },
> >
> > Add .data for these too.
> >
>
> I was wondering if I can define a platform data for both ast2400 and
> ast2500 as they have the same configurations.
>
> For example:
>
> static const struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata ast2400_sgpio_pdata = {
> .max_ngpios = 80,
> .pin_mask = GENMASK(9, 6),
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id aspeed_sgpio_of_table[] = {
> { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-sgpio", .data = ast2400_sgpio_pdata, },
> { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-sgpio", .data = ast2400_sgpio_pdata, },
>
Yep, that's fine.
Cheers,
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists