linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] kunit: tool: Support skipped tests in kunit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd5g47iZTc2opF7umkFWN9Zczw_FUXec1oAgLwMS_GMfYNV=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:21:00 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc:     Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] kunit: tool: Support skipped tests in kunit_tool

On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:50 PM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Add support for the SKIP directive to kunit_tool's TAP parser.
>
> Skipped tests now show up as such in the printed summary. The number of
> skipped tests is counted, and if all tests in a suite are skipped, the
> suite is also marked as skipped. Otherwise, skipped tests do affect the
> suite result.
>
> Example output:
> [00:22:34] ======== [SKIPPED] example_skip ========
> [00:22:34] [SKIPPED] example_skip_test # SKIP this test should be skipped
> [00:22:34] [SKIPPED] example_mark_skipped_test # SKIP this test should be skipped
> [00:22:34] ============================================================
> [00:22:34] Testing complete. 2 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 2 skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>