[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210608.163006.1251722799035175174.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 16:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: zhengyongjun3@...wei.com
Cc: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ping: Check return value of function
'ping_queue_rcv_skb'
From: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:42:46 +0800
> --- a/net/ipv4/ping.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ping.c
> @@ -954,6 +954,7 @@ bool ping_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct sock *sk;
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> struct icmphdr *icmph = icmp_hdr(skb);
> + bool rc = false;
>
> /* We assume the packet has already been checked by icmp_rcv */
>
> @@ -968,14 +969,13 @@ bool ping_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct sk_buff *skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> pr_debug("rcv on socket %p\n", sk);
> - if (skb2)
> - ping_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb2);
> + if (skb2 && !ping_queue_rcv_skb(sk, skb2))
> + rc = true;
> sock_put(sk);
> - return true;
> }
> pr_debug("no socket, dropping\n");
>
> - return false;
> + return rc;
YOu have chsanged the control flowe in a way that this pr_debug() can be inaccurate.
It can print when we did find a socket.
Please fix this.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists