[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR12MB5481D66883EA5F32AA8488B0DC379@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 05:29:29 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
CC: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Adit Ranadive <aditr@...are.com>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
"clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com"
<clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@...adcom.com>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Kalderon <mkalderon@...vell.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
Naresh Kumar PBS <nareshkumar.pbs@...adcom.com>,
Nelson Escobar <neescoba@...co.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Potnuri Bharat Teja <bharat@...lsio.com>,
Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rdma-next v1 14/15] RDMA/core: Allow port_groups to be
used with namespaces
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 5:02 AM
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 01:29:58PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >
> >
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 1:48 PM
> > >
> > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > >
> > > Now that the port_groups data is being destroyed and managed by the
> > > core code this restriction is no longer needed. All the
> > > ib_port_attrs are compatible with the core's sysfs lifecycle.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > > drivers/infiniband/core/device.c | 10 ++++------
> > > drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > index 2cbd77933ea5..92f224a97481 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> > > @@ -1698,13 +1698,11 @@ int ib_device_set_netns_put(struct sk_buff
> > > *skb,
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > - * Currently supported only for those providers which support
> > > - * disassociation and don't do port specific sysfs init. Once a
> > > - * port_cleanup infrastructure is implemented, this limitation will be
> > > - * removed.
> > > + * All the ib_clients, including uverbs, are reset when the
> > > +namespace
> > > is
> > > + * changed and this cannot be blocked waiting for userspace to do
> > > + * something, so disassociation is mandatory.
> > > */
> > > - if (!dev->ops.disassociate_ucontext || dev->ops.port_groups ||
> > > - ib_devices_shared_netns) {
>
> So this is OK since we have the clean up now
>
I didn't review the whole series, but yes if there is sysfs clean routine, it should be ok.
> > > + if (!dev->ops.disassociate_ucontext || ib_devices_shared_netns) {
> > > ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > goto ns_err;
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c
> > > b/drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c index 09a2e1066df0..f42034fcf3d9
> > > 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/sysfs.c
> > > @@ -1236,11 +1236,9 @@ static struct ib_port *setup_port(struct
> > > ib_core_device *coredev, int port_num,
> > > ret = sysfs_create_groups(&p->kobj, p->groups_list);
> > > if (ret)
> > > goto err_del;
> > > - if (is_full_dev) {
> > > - ret = sysfs_create_groups(&p->kobj, device-
> > > >ops.port_groups);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - goto err_groups;
> > > - }
> > > + ret = sysfs_create_groups(&p->kobj, device->ops.port_groups);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto err_groups;
> >
> > This will expose counters in all net namespaces in shared mode
> > (default case). Application running in one net namespace will be able
> > to monitor counters of other net namespace. This should be avoided.
>
> And you want this to stay blocked because the port_groups mostly contain
> counters?
Yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists