[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YL8+zeC9xjpzA81j@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 11:56:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, lma@...ihalf.com,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, lb@...ihalf.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mbenes@...e.com,
Radosław Biernacki <rad@...ihalf.com>,
upstream@...ihalf.com,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] objtool,x86: Rewrite retpoline thunk calls
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 01:54:37PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> The only thing that's still different is that the `file` command still
> prints "no section header."
>
> $ find . -name \*.lto.o | xargs file | rev | cut -d , -f 1 | rev |
> sort | uniq -c
> 1 no section header
That's not due to objtool, is it?
$ file amdgpu.lto.o.orig
amdgpu.lto.o.orig: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), no section header
Powered by blists - more mailing lists