[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7463b3ed-07d3-7157-629d-a85a3ff558d6@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 13:18:55 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Marek Kedzierski <mkedzier@...hat.com>,
Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Scott Cheloha <cheloha@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/12] mm/memory_hotplug: remove nid parameter from
remove_memory() and friends
On 08.06.21 13:11, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> writes:
>> There is only a single user remaining. We can simply try to offline all
>> online nodes - which is fast, because we usually span pages and can skip
>> such nodes right away.
>
> That makes me slightly nervous, because our big powerpc boxes tend to
> trip on these scaling issues before others.
>
> But the spanned pages check is just:
>
> void try_offline_node(int nid)
> {
> pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> ...
> if (pgdat->node_spanned_pages)
> return;
>
> So I guess that's pretty cheap, and it's only O(nodes), which should
> never get that big.
Exactly. And if it does turn out to be a problem, we can walk all memory
blocks before removing them, collecting the nid(s).
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists