[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcwW6RGALAjzcK4W9xy_hDPyFti4cNY_pCwJnjUr+VYVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:50:22 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, glittao@...il.com,
vinmenon@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to debugfs
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 11:45 AM Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues,
> one is PAGE_SIZE limitation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere
> to "one value per file" rule.
>
> To overcome this issues, move the alloc_calls and free_calls
> implementation to debugfs.
>
> Debugfs cache will be created if SLAB_STORE_USER flag is set.
>
> Rename the alloc_calls/free_calls to alloc_traces/free_traces,
> to be inline with what it does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed <faiyazm@...eaurora.org>
> ---
It seems you missed the version bump along with changelog.
Note, some maintainers (actually quite many I think) are using tools
to fetch up the patches and two patches with the same version is a
problem. Hence I do not consider it a nit-pick.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists