lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWgLf8GJfOaRUyx=AvOTnuOs8FS-2=C+OCk02OLDCyrDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 15:37:47 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Omkar Kulkarni <okulkarni@...vell.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Dean Balandin <dbalandin@...vell.com>,
        Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...cle.com>,
        Shai Malin <smalin@...vell.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: NVME_TCP_OFFLOAD should not default to m

Hi Christoph,

On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:19 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 12:56:09PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The help text for the symbol controlling support for the NVM Express
> > over Fabrics TCP offload common layer suggests to not enable this
> > support when unsure.
> >
> > Hence drop the "default m", which actually means "default y" if
> > CONFIG_MODULES is not enabled.
> >
> > Fixes: f0e8cb6106da2703 ("nvme-tcp-offload: Add nvme-tcp-offload - NVMeTCP HW offload ULP")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
> Err, where did this appear from?  This code has not been accepted into
> the NVMe tree and is indeed not acceptable in this form.

It was applied to net-next.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ