| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:50:18 +0800
From: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...ndingux.net>
Cc: ulf.hansson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dongsheng.qiu@...enic.com, aric.pzqi@...enic.com,
rick.tyliu@...enic.com, sihui.liu@...enic.com,
jun.jiang@...enic.com, sernia.zhou@...mail.com,
paul@...pouillou.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: JZ4740: Add support for JZ4775 and rename
unreasonable array name.
Hi Paul,
On 2021/6/8 下午9:44, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Zhou,
>
> Le lun., juin 7 2021 at 02:08:04 +0800, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
> <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com> a écrit :
>> 1.Add support for probing mmc driver on the JZ4775 SoC from Ingenic.
>> 2.When the support for JZ4775 SoC is added, there will be six compatible
>> strings, so renaming "jz4740_mmc_of_match[]" to
>> "jz4740_mmc_of_matches[]"
>> is more reasonable.
>
> Honestly, you can drop #2. We don't really care about the
> variable/function names not being "perfect". For instance this driver
> still use "jz4740_mmc*" functions everywhere even though it supports
> many more SoCs. Besides, renames like that makes it harder to "git
> blame" afterwards since it fills the git history with non-functional
> changes.
Sure, I will drop #2.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c
>> b/drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c
>> index b3c636e..ea8434f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>> /*
>> * Copyright (C) 2009-2010, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
>> * Copyright (C) 2013, Imagination Technologies
>> + * Copyright (C) 2021, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
>> <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
>> *
>> * JZ4740 SD/MMC controller driver
>> */
>> @@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ enum jz4740_mmc_version {
>> JZ_MMC_JZ4740,
>> JZ_MMC_JZ4725B,
>> JZ_MMC_JZ4760,
>> + JZ_MMC_JZ4775,
>> JZ_MMC_JZ4780,
>> JZ_MMC_X1000,
>> };
>> @@ -138,7 +140,7 @@ enum jz4740_mmc_state {
>> * COOKIE_MAPPED: the request was mapped in the irq handler,
>> * and should be unmapped before mmc_request_done is called..
>> */
>> -enum jz4780_cookie {
>> +enum jz4775_cookie {
>> COOKIE_UNMAPPED = 0,
>> COOKIE_PREMAPPED,
>> COOKIE_MAPPED,
>> @@ -194,7 +196,7 @@ static void jz4740_mmc_write_irq_mask(struct
>> jz4740_mmc_host *host,
>> static void jz4740_mmc_write_irq_reg(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host,
>> uint32_t val)
>> {
>> - if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4780)
>> + if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4775)
>> writel(val, host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_IREG);
>> else
>> writew(val, host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_IREG);
>> @@ -202,7 +204,7 @@ static void jz4740_mmc_write_irq_reg(struct
>> jz4740_mmc_host *host,
>>
>> static uint32_t jz4740_mmc_read_irq_reg(struct jz4740_mmc_host *host)
>> {
>> - if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4780)
>> + if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4775)
>> return readl(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_IREG);
>> else
>> return readw(host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_IREG);
>> @@ -674,7 +676,7 @@ static void jz4740_mmc_send_command(struct
>> jz4740_mmc_host *host,
>> cmdat |= JZ_MMC_CMDAT_WRITE;
>> if (host->use_dma) {
>> /*
>> - * The 4780's MMC controller has integrated DMA ability
>> + * The JZ4775's MMC controller has integrated DMA ability
>> * in addition to being able to use the external DMA
>> * controller. It moves DMA control bits to a separate
>> * register. The DMA_SEL bit chooses the external
>> @@ -682,13 +684,13 @@ static void jz4740_mmc_send_command(struct
>> jz4740_mmc_host *host,
>> * can only use the external controller, and have a
>> * single DMA enable bit in CMDAT.
>> */
>> - if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4780) {
>> + if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4775) {
>> writel(JZ_MMC_DMAC_DMA_EN | JZ_MMC_DMAC_DMA_SEL,
>> host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_DMAC);
>> } else {
>> cmdat |= JZ_MMC_CMDAT_DMA_EN;
>> }
>> - } else if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4780) {
>> + } else if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4775) {
>> writel(0, host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_DMAC);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -866,7 +868,7 @@ static int jz4740_mmc_set_clock_rate(struct
>> jz4740_mmc_host *host, int rate)
>> writew(div, host->base + JZ_REG_MMC_CLKRT);
>>
>> if (real_rate > 25000000) {
>> - if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_X1000) {
>> + if (host->version >= JZ_MMC_JZ4775) {
>
> This changes the behaviour for the JZ4780.
>
> Even if it is correct, this belongs in its own commit (with a Fixes
> tag), or at the very least a mention about it in the commit message.
In fact, both JZ4775 and JZ4780 support this feature, I will add a
corresponding description in the commit message.
>
>> writel(JZ_MMC_LPM_DRV_RISING_QTR_PHASE_DLY |
>> JZ_MMC_LPM_SMP_RISING_QTR_OR_HALF_PHASE_DLY |
>> JZ_MMC_LPM_LOW_POWER_MODE_EN,
>> @@ -955,15 +957,16 @@ static const struct mmc_host_ops jz4740_mmc_ops
>> = {
>> .enable_sdio_irq = jz4740_mmc_enable_sdio_irq,
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct of_device_id jz4740_mmc_of_match[] = {
>> +static const struct of_device_id jz4740_mmc_of_matches[] = {
>> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-mmc", .data = (void *)
>> JZ_MMC_JZ4740 },
>> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4725b-mmc", .data = (void
>> *)JZ_MMC_JZ4725B },
>> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-mmc", .data = (void *)
>> JZ_MMC_JZ4760 },
>> + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4775-mmc", .data = (void *)
>> JZ_MMC_JZ4775 },
>> { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-mmc", .data = (void *)
>> JZ_MMC_JZ4780 },
>
> Looks to me that the JZ4775 and JZ4780 have the exact same behaviour,
> so this patch could have been a one-liner, adding "ingenic,jz4775-mmc"
> with the JZ_MMC_JZ4780 ID.
>
Sure, I will change it in the next version.
Thanks and best regards!
> Cheers,
> -Paul
>
>> { .compatible = "ingenic,x1000-mmc", .data = (void *)
>> JZ_MMC_X1000 },
>> {},
>> };
>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, jz4740_mmc_of_match);
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, jz4740_mmc_of_matches);
>>
>> static int jz4740_mmc_probe(struct platform_device* pdev)
>> {
>> @@ -980,7 +983,7 @@ static int jz4740_mmc_probe(struct
>> platform_device* pdev)
>>
>> host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>>
>> - match = of_match_device(jz4740_mmc_of_match, &pdev->dev);
>> + match = of_match_device(jz4740_mmc_of_matches, &pdev->dev);
>> if (match) {
>> host->version = (enum jz4740_mmc_version)match->data;
>> } else {
>> @@ -1124,7 +1127,7 @@ static struct platform_driver jz4740_mmc_driver
>> = {
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "jz4740-mmc",
>> .probe_type = PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS,
>> - .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(jz4740_mmc_of_match),
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(jz4740_mmc_of_matches),
>> .pm = pm_ptr(&jz4740_mmc_pm_ops),
>> },
>> };
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists