linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: add basic controls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e8ca16d9-f179-c6de-d683-21180ea4ed1b@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:20:31 +0100
From:   Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: add basic controls



On 08/06/2021 14:59, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:31:55PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> 
>> +static int wcd938x_rx_hph_mode_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> +				   struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
>> +{
>> +	struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
>> +	struct wcd938x_priv *wcd938x = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
>> +
>> +	wcd938x->hph_mode = ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> _put() should return true if it made a change, the same bug is present
> in a lot of other drivers too.
> 
Sure will fix this in next spin

>> +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new wcd9380_snd_controls[] = {
>> +	SOC_ENUM_EXT("RX HPH Mode", rx_hph_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380,
>> +		     wcd938x_rx_hph_mode_get, wcd938x_rx_hph_mode_put),
>> +	SOC_ENUM_EXT("TX0 MODE", tx_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380[0],
>> +		     wcd938x_tx_mode_get, wcd938x_tx_mode_put),
>> +	SOC_ENUM_EXT("TX1 MODE", tx_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380[1],
>> +		     wcd938x_tx_mode_get, wcd938x_tx_mode_put),
>> +	SOC_ENUM_EXT("TX2 MODE", tx_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380[2],
>> +		     wcd938x_tx_mode_get, wcd938x_tx_mode_put),
>> +	SOC_ENUM_EXT("TX3 MODE", tx_mode_mux_enum_wcd9380[3],
>> +		     wcd938x_tx_mode_get, wcd938x_tx_mode_put),
>> +};
> 
> Please don't use this pattern of indexing into arrays by absolute
> number, it's error prone and hard to read.  Just declare static
> variables for the enums and reference them individually.

I agree, will clean these instances in next version.

--srini
>