[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMDVdGwo+3zaxEAv@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:51:32 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: trix@...hat.com
Cc: mdf@...nel.org, hao.wu@...el.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
nava.manne@...inx.com, dinguyen@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, yilun.xu@...el.com,
arnd@...db.de, fpacheco@...hat.com, richard.gong@...el.com,
luca@...aceresoli.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] fpga: reorganize to subdirs
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 07:22:03AM -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
> The incoming xrt patchset has a toplevel subdir xrt/
> The current fpga/ uses a single dir with filename prefixes to subdivide owners
> For consistency, there should be only one way to organize the fpga/ dir.
> Because the subdir model scales better, refactor to use it.
> The discussion wrt xrt is here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/68e85a4f-4a10-1ff9-0443-aa565878c855@redhat.com/
Why am I getting 2 copies of 0/4?
Please fix your email client...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists