[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210609151126.GD68237@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 17:11:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Lukasz Majczak <lma@...ihalf.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mbenes@...e.com,
Radosław Biernacki <rad@...ihalf.com>,
upstream@...ihalf.com,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] objtool,x86: Rewrite retpoline thunk calls
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:08:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I wonder if the compiler will also generate conditional tail calls, and
> what that does with static_call... now I have to check all that.
OK.. static call patching infra will give us a nice WARN before it dies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists