lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6b75133-e85f-903e-82e3-c04cc2a14d00@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:23:16 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        valentina.manea.m@...il.com
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usbip: tools: usbipd: use ARRAY_SIZE for sockfdlist

On 6/9/21 3:51 AM, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of dividing sizeof array with sizeof an
> element.
> 
> Clean up the following coccicheck warning:
> 
> ./tools/usb/usbip/src/usbipd.c:536:19-20: WARNING: Use ARRAY_SIZE.
> 
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   tools/usb/usbip/src/usbipd.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/usb/usbip/src/usbipd.c b/tools/usb/usbip/src/usbipd.c
> index 48398a7..4826d13 100644
> --- a/tools/usb/usbip/src/usbipd.c
> +++ b/tools/usb/usbip/src/usbipd.c
> @@ -532,8 +532,7 @@ static int do_standalone_mode(int daemonize, int ipv4, int ipv6)
>   		usbip_driver_close(driver);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> -	nsockfd = listen_all_addrinfo(ai_head, sockfdlist,
> -		sizeof(sockfdlist) / sizeof(*sockfdlist));
> +	nsockfd = listen_all_addrinfo(ai_head, sockfdlist, ARRAY_SIZE(sockfdlist));
>   	freeaddrinfo(ai_head);
>   	if (nsockfd <= 0) {
>   		err("failed to open a listening socket");
> 

The change looks good. Does this change compile for you?
Doesn't for me?

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ