[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkqCJx11qCz0rNNz89C9O+Po8UoS5v_H_Qg3M8Q1eUp5pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:02:51 -0700
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Wang Yugui <wangyugui@...-tech.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Jue Wang <juew@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] mm/thp: unmap_mapping_page() to fix THP truncate_cleanup_page()
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 9:19 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> There is a race between THP unmapping and truncation, when truncate sees
> pmd_none() and skips the entry, after munmap's zap_huge_pmd() cleared it,
> but before its page_remove_rmap() gets to decrement compound_mapcount:
> generating false "BUG: Bad page cache" reports that the page is still
> mapped when deleted. This commit fixes that, but not in the way I hoped.
>
> The first attempt used try_to_unmap(page, TTU_SYNC|TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK)
> instead of unmap_mapping_range() in truncate_cleanup_page(): it has often
> been an annoyance that we usually call unmap_mapping_range() with no pages
> locked, but there apply it to a single locked page. try_to_unmap() looks
> more suitable for a single locked page.
>
> However, try_to_unmap_one() contains a VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!pvmw.pte,page):
> it is used to insert THP migration entries, but not used to unmap THPs.
> Copy zap_huge_pmd() and add THP handling now? Perhaps, but their TLB
> needs are different, I'm too ignorant of the DAX cases, and couldn't
> decide how far to go for anon+swap. Set that aside.
>
> The second attempt took a different tack: make no change in truncate.c,
> but modify zap_huge_pmd() to insert an invalidated huge pmd instead of
> clearing it initially, then pmd_clear() between page_remove_rmap() and
> unlocking at the end. Nice. But powerpc blows that approach out of the
> water, with its serialize_against_pte_lookup(), and interesting pgtable
> usage. It would need serious help to get working on powerpc (with a
> minor optimization issue on s390 too). Set that aside.
>
> Just add an "if (page_mapped(page)) synchronize_rcu();" or other such
> delay, after unmapping in truncate_cleanup_page()? Perhaps, but though
> that's likely to reduce or eliminate the number of incidents, it would
> give less assurance of whether we had identified the problem correctly.
>
> This successful iteration introduces "unmap_mapping_page(page)" instead
> of try_to_unmap(), and goes the usual unmap_mapping_range_tree() route,
> with an addition to details. Then zap_pmd_range() watches for this case,
> and does spin_unlock(pmd_lock) if so - just like page_vma_mapped_walk()
> now does in the PVMW_SYNC case. Not pretty, but safe.
>
> Note that unmap_mapping_page() is doing a VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked) to
> assert its interface; but currently that's only used to make sure that
> page->mapping is stable, and zap_pmd_range() doesn't care if the page is
> locked or not. Along these lines, in invalidate_inode_pages2_range()
> move the initial unmap_mapping_range() out from under page lock, before
> then calling unmap_mapping_page() under page lock if still mapped.
>
> Fixes: fc127da085c2 ("truncate: handle file thp")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 3 +++
> mm/memory.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/truncate.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index c274f75efcf9..8ae31622deef 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1719,6 +1719,7 @@ struct zap_details {
> struct address_space *check_mapping; /* Check page->mapping if set */
> pgoff_t first_index; /* Lowest page->index to unmap */
> pgoff_t last_index; /* Highest page->index to unmap */
> + struct page *single_page; /* Locked page to be unmapped */
> };
>
> struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> @@ -1766,6 +1767,7 @@ extern vm_fault_t handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> extern int fixup_user_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
> unsigned long address, unsigned int fault_flags,
> bool *unlocked);
> +void unmap_mapping_page(struct page *page);
> void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> pgoff_t start, pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows);
> void unmap_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
> @@ -1786,6 +1788,7 @@ static inline int fixup_user_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
> BUG();
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> +static inline void unmap_mapping_page(struct page *page) { }
> static inline void unmap_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
> pgoff_t start, pgoff_t nr, bool even_cows) { }
> static inline void unmap_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index f3ffab9b9e39..ee1163df3a53 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -1361,7 +1361,17 @@ static inline unsigned long zap_pmd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> else if (zap_huge_pmd(tlb, vma, pmd, addr))
> goto next;
> /* fall through */
> + } else if (details && details->single_page &&
> + PageTransCompound(details->single_page) &&
> + next - addr == HPAGE_PMD_SIZE && pmd_none(*pmd)) {
> + /*
> + * Take and drop THP pmd lock so that we cannot return
> + * prematurely, while zap_huge_pmd() has cleared *pmd,
> + * but not yet decremented compound_mapcount().
> + */
> + spin_unlock(pmd_lock(tlb->mm, pmd));
Just a nit, why not follow the style of patch #3 to have lock and
unlock with separate lines?
> }
> +
> /*
> * Here there can be other concurrent MADV_DONTNEED or
> * trans huge page faults running, and if the pmd is
> @@ -3236,6 +3246,36 @@ static inline void unmap_mapping_range_tree(struct rb_root_cached *root,
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * unmap_mapping_page() - Unmap single page from processes.
> + * @page: The locked page to be unmapped.
> + *
> + * Unmap this page from any userspace process which still has it mmaped.
> + * Typically, for efficiency, the range of nearby pages has already been
> + * unmapped by unmap_mapping_pages() or unmap_mapping_range(). But once
> + * truncation or invalidation holds the lock on a page, it may find that
> + * the page has been remapped again: and then uses unmap_mapping_page()
> + * to unmap it finally.
> + */
> +void unmap_mapping_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
> + struct zap_details details = { };
> +
> + VM_BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
> + VM_BUG_ON(PageTail(page));
> +
> + details.check_mapping = mapping;
> + details.first_index = page->index;
> + details.last_index = page->index + thp_nr_pages(page) - 1;
> + details.single_page = page;
> +
> + i_mmap_lock_write(mapping);
> + if (unlikely(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap.rb_root)))
> + unmap_mapping_range_tree(&mapping->i_mmap, &details);
> + i_mmap_unlock_write(mapping);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * unmap_mapping_pages() - Unmap pages from processes.
> * @mapping: The address space containing pages to be unmapped.
> diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
> index 95af244b112a..234ddd879caa 100644
> --- a/mm/truncate.c
> +++ b/mm/truncate.c
> @@ -167,13 +167,10 @@ void do_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
> * its lock, b) when a concurrent invalidate_mapping_pages got there first and
> * c) when tmpfs swizzles a page between a tmpfs inode and swapper_space.
> */
> -static void
> -truncate_cleanup_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
> +static void truncate_cleanup_page(struct page *page)
> {
> - if (page_mapped(page)) {
> - unsigned int nr = thp_nr_pages(page);
> - unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, page->index, nr, false);
> - }
> + if (page_mapped(page))
> + unmap_mapping_page(page);
>
> if (page_has_private(page))
> do_invalidatepage(page, 0, thp_size(page));
> @@ -218,7 +215,7 @@ int truncate_inode_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
> if (page->mapping != mapping)
> return -EIO;
>
> - truncate_cleanup_page(mapping, page);
> + truncate_cleanup_page(page);
> delete_from_page_cache(page);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -325,7 +322,7 @@ void truncate_inode_pages_range(struct address_space *mapping,
> index = indices[pagevec_count(&pvec) - 1] + 1;
> truncate_exceptional_pvec_entries(mapping, &pvec, indices);
> for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(&pvec); i++)
> - truncate_cleanup_page(mapping, pvec.pages[i]);
> + truncate_cleanup_page(pvec.pages[i]);
> delete_from_page_cache_batch(mapping, &pvec);
> for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(&pvec); i++)
> unlock_page(pvec.pages[i]);
> @@ -639,6 +636,16 @@ int invalidate_inode_pages2_range(struct address_space *mapping,
> continue;
> }
>
> + if (!did_range_unmap && page_mapped(page)) {
> + /*
> + * If page is mapped, before taking its lock,
> + * zap the rest of the file in one hit.
> + */
> + unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index,
> + (1 + end - index), false);
> + did_range_unmap = 1;
> + }
> +
> lock_page(page);
> WARN_ON(page_to_index(page) != index);
> if (page->mapping != mapping) {
> @@ -646,23 +653,11 @@ int invalidate_inode_pages2_range(struct address_space *mapping,
> continue;
> }
> wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> - if (page_mapped(page)) {
> - if (!did_range_unmap) {
> - /*
> - * Zap the rest of the file in one hit.
> - */
> - unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index,
> - (1 + end - index), false);
> - did_range_unmap = 1;
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * Just zap this page
> - */
> - unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, index,
> - 1, false);
> - }
> - }
> +
> + if (page_mapped(page))
> + unmap_mapping_page(page);
> BUG_ON(page_mapped(page));
> +
> ret2 = do_launder_page(mapping, page);
> if (ret2 == 0) {
> if (!invalidate_complete_page2(mapping, page))
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists