linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] fpga: reorganize to subdirs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aba774cb-1135-26aa-6e20-3c00b4e269ac@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:52:44 -0700
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     mdf@...nel.org, hao.wu@...el.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
        nava.manne@...inx.com, dinguyen@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, yilun.xu@...el.com,
        arnd@...db.de, fpacheco@...hat.com, richard.gong@...el.com,
        luca@...aceresoli.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] fpga: reorganize to subdirs


On 6/9/21 10:13 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:50:39AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>> On 6/9/21 9:38 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 08:08:06AM -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
>>>> On 6/9/21 7:53 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 07:22:03AM -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
>>>>>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The incoming xrt patchset has a toplevel subdir xrt/
>>>>>> The current fpga/ uses a single dir with filename prefixes to subdivide owners
>>>>>> For consistency, there should be only one way to organize the fpga/ dir.
>>>>>> Because the subdir model scales better, refactor to use it.
>>>>>> The discussion wrt xrt is here:
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/68e85a4f-4a10-1ff9-0443-aa565878c855@redhat.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Follow drivers/net/ethernet/ which has control configs
>>>>>> NET_VENDOR_BLA that map to drivers/net/ethernet/bla
>>>>>> Since fpgas do not have many vendors, drop the 'VENDOR' and use
>>>>>> FPGA_BLA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are several new subdirs
>>>>>> altera/
>>>>>> dfl/
>>>>>> lattice/
>>>>>> xilinx/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Each subdir has a Kconfig that has a new/reused
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if FPGA_BLA
>>>>>>      ... existing configs ...
>>>>>> endif FPGA_BLA
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which is sourced into the main fpga/Kconfig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Each subdir has a Makefile whose transversal is controlled in the
>>>>>> fpga/Makefile by
>>>>>>
>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_BLA) += bla/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Some cleanup to arrange thing alphabetically and make fpga/Makefile's
>>>>>> whitespace look more like net/'s
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes from
>>>>>> v1
>>>>>>      Drop renaming files
>>>>>>      Cleanup makefiles
>>>>> You can rename the files, you just can not rename the .ko objects
>>>>> without everyone knowing what you are doing and you trying to bury it in
>>>>> the middle of a differently described patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to do that, do you?  I don't really understand why you want
>>>>> to move things around right now other than "we have 40 files in one
>>>>> directory, ick!".
>>>> I am trying to resolve the layout inconsistency between what we have and
>>>> what the xrt patchset does.
>>> Why does it matter?  New stuff can be added to a new dir, why worry
>>> about old stuff?  What does it hurt?
>>>
>>>> The big issue is the files vs dirs.
>>>>
>>>> Over specified filenames is secondary, so I dropped them.
>>>>
>>>> 40 files in one dir is itself not a problem.
>>>>
>>>> having 40 files and an xrt/ is.
>>> Why is that a "problem"?
>>>
>>>> fpga/ layout should be consistent so the Makefile and Kconfig are easier to
>>>> maintain.
>>> Is it somehow hard to maintain today?  Seems pretty trivial to me...
>> This change was to help move xrt along.
>>
>> If you are fine with xrt/, I will drop this patchset.
> Who has objected to xrt/ being the only new subdirectory?

Maybe just me, but it has been mostly me doing the review.

all of my easy comments have been nearly resolved.

now I am looking at bigger issues like this, should subdev's move out of 
fpga/ etc.

>
> My main complaints here are:
> 	- these patches were not tested
> 	- you renamed kernel modules "accidentally"
> 	- you forgot SPDX lines
> 	- lack of description of why these files being moved was
> 	  necessary in the changelog where you moved the files
>
> Remember, patch 0/X never shows up in changelogs...

I will respin and collapse the patches to a single patch with a better 
commit log.

They aren't really useful except as a full change.

Testing will be done for dfl.

Tom

>
> You can do better :)
>
> greg k-h
>