linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kallsyms: fix nonconverging kallsyms table with lld

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:15:53 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Mikhail Petrov <Mikhail.Petrov@....dev>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        mfaltesek@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kallsyms: fix nonconverging kallsyms table with lld

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 08:16:11AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 01:24:18PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 1:05 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 04:29:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > > >
> > > > ARM randconfig builds with lld sometimes show a build failure
> > > > from kallsyms:
> > > >
> > > >   Inconsistent kallsyms data
> > > >   Try make KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS=1 as a workaround
> > > >
> > > > The problem is the veneers/thunks getting added by the linker extend
> > > > the symbol table, which in turn leads to more veneers being needed,
> > > > so it may take a few extra iterations to converge.
> > > >
> > > > This bug has been fixed multiple times before, but comes back every time
> > > > a new symbol name is used. lld uses a different set of idenitifiers from
> > > > ld.bfd, so the additional ones need to be added as well.
> > > >
> > > > I looked through the sources and found that arm64 and mips define similar
> > > > prefixes, so I'm adding those as well, aside from the ones I observed. I'm
> > > > not sure about powerpc64, which seems to already be handled through a
> > > > section match, but if it comes back, the "__long_branch_" and "__plt_"
> > > > prefixes would have to get added as well.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is such a whack-a-mole. The problem is hitting us yet again. I suspect
> > > it may be due to a new version of lld using new symbols, but I didn't really
> > > try to track it down. Is there an easy way to search for missed symbols ?
> > 
> > The way I did it previously was to hack Kbuild to not remove the temporary
> > files after a failure, and then compare the "objdump --syms" output of the
> > last two stages.
> 
> Problem with that is that we have a non-deterministic problem: The build
> fails for us on some build servers, but we are unable to reproduce the
> problem when building the same image manually on a development server.
> That is similar to what I had observed before, where powerpc builds would
> pass on one server, but the same kernel with the same configuration would
> fail to build on a second almost identical server. It would really be great
> if we can find a better solution.
> 
> > 
> > I suppose we could improve the situation if scripts/link-vmlinux.sh was able
> > to do that automatically, and compare the kallsyms output .S file between
> > steps 1 and 2.
> 
> Comparing the .S files doesn't result in useful data; turns out there are
> always irrelevant differences. We'll try to run a diff on the output of
> "objdump --syms". Hopefully that will generate something useful.
> 

Turns out it wasn't that useful.

chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: Symbol file differences:
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: 7c7
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: < 00000000000325c8 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_relative_base
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: ---
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: > 00000000000325c0 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_relative_base
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: 9,13c9,13
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: < 00000000000325d0 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_num_syms
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: < 00000000000325d8 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_names
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: < 00000000000cd7f0 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_markers
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: < 00000000000cdb18 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_token_table
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: < 00000000000cde78 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_token_index
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: ---
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: > 00000000000325c8 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_num_syms
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: > 00000000000325d0 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_names
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: > 00000000000cd7d8 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_markers
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: > 00000000000cdb00 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_token_table
chromeos-kernel-5_10-5.10.42-r406: > 00000000000cde60 g       .rodata	0000000000000000 kallsyms_token_index

I thought I'd see the added symbols, but it looks like the only difference
between the two files is the addresses.

What am I missing ?

Thanks,
Guenter