[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMEo40AhQipABk3u@fedora64.linuxtx.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:47:31 -0500
From: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.12 000/161] 5.12.10-rc1 review
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:25:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.12.10 release.
> There are 161 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:59:18 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.12.10-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Tested rc1 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@...oraproject.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists