[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLoDVE03-Eqmrji66P-b79ezgD0PayWqO5u3L7nyjMX1+LBtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 22:38:04 +0100
From: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ACPI: scan: ensure ret is initialized to avoid
garbage being returned
Hi Colin
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:33 PM Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> In the unlikely event that there are no callback calls made then ret
> will be returned as an uninitialized value. Clean up static analysis
> warnings by ensuring ret is initialized.
Ah, thanks - good spot.
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
> Fixes: a9e10e587304 ("ACPI: scan: Extend acpi_walk_dep_device_list()")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
I'm still bad at Git; will the commit hash here be right, since the
patch that this fixes isn't upstream yet?
(hope the gmail web client doesn't maul this too badly...)
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index c3067e8bfc47..0945d952f0fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ int acpi_walk_dep_device_list(acpi_handle handle,
> void *data)
> {
> struct acpi_dep_data *dep, *tmp;
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&acpi_dep_list_lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp, &acpi_dep_list, node) {
> --
> 2.31.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists