[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMBlGBxaWDPV1ouT@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:52:08 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] mm: replace CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES with
CONFIG_NUMA
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:25:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2021 12:13:15 +0300 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> >
> > After removal of DISCINTIGMEM the NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES and NUMA
> > configuration options are equivalent.
> >
> > Drop CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES and use CONFIG_NUMA instead.
> >
> > Done with
> >
> > $ sed -i 's/CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES/CONFIG_NUMA/' \
> > $(git grep -wl CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES)
> > $ sed -i 's/NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES/NUMA/' \
> > $(git grep -wl NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES)
> >
> > with manual tweaks afterwards.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ extern int movable_zone;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> > static inline int zone_movable_is_highmem(void)
> > {
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> > return movable_zone == ZONE_HIGHMEM;
> > #else
> > return (ZONE_MOVABLE - 1) == ZONE_HIGHMEM;
>
> I dropped this hunk - your "mm/mmzone.h: simplify is_highmem_idx()"
> removed zone_movable_is_highmem().
Ah, right.
Thanks!
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists