lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1824cdc-7e2f-a38f-d019-e1d8f92ead2b@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:43:55 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>,
        Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>,
        Dennis YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5, 3/4] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add component RDMA4



On 12/04/2021 16:04, Yongqiang Niu wrote:
> This patch add component RDMA4
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> index 7718cd6..4bba275 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ enum mtk_ddp_comp_id {
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0,
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1,
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA2,
> +	DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA4,

Pach 1-3 looks good, but could be squashed in one patch. Please try to come up
with a more descriptive commit message. Rule of thumb is to explain why we need
a patch not what the patch does.

Regards,
Matthias

>  	DDP_COMPONENT_UFOE,
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA0,
>  	DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA1,
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ