linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] IB/core: Removed port validity check from ib_get_cached_subnet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YMB9wEygi58hjDLy@unreal>
Date:   Wed, 9 Jun 2021 11:37:20 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Anand Khoje <anand.a.khoje@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dledford@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca, haakon.bugge@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] IB/core: Removed port validity check from
 ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 11:25:32AM +0530, Anand Khoje wrote:
> Removed port validity check from ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix()
> as this check is not needed because "port_num" is valid.
> 
> Suggested-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Khoje <anand.a.khoje@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>     -	Added changes as per Leon's suggestion of removing port
>     validity check from ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix().
>     -	Split the v1 patch in 3 patches as per Leon's suggestion.
> v2 -> v3:
>     -	Added some formatting changes per Leon's suggestions
>     and removed return from ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix.
> 
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c     |  6 +-----
>  drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h |  2 +-
>  drivers/infiniband/core/device.c    | 13 ++++---------
>  drivers/infiniband/core/security.c  |  7 ++-----
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c
> index 3b0991fedd81..e957f0c915a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/cache.c
> @@ -1069,19 +1069,15 @@ int ib_get_cached_pkey(struct ib_device *device,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_get_cached_pkey);
>  
> -int ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix(struct ib_device *device, u32 port_num,
> +void ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix(struct ib_device *device, u32 port_num,
>  				u64 *sn_pfx)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> -	if (!rdma_is_port_valid(device, port_num))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	read_lock_irqsave(&device->cache_lock, flags);
>  	*sn_pfx = device->port_data[port_num].cache.subnet_prefix;
>  	read_unlock_irqrestore(&device->cache_lock, flags);
>  
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h b/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
> index 29809dd30041..0b23f50fa958 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/core_priv.h
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int ib_nl_handle_ip_res_resp(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			     struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>  			     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>  
> -int ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix(struct ib_device *device,
> +void ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix(struct ib_device *device,
>  				u32 port_num,
>  				u64 *sn_pfx);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> index c660cef66ac6..595128b26c34 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/device.c
> @@ -886,15 +886,10 @@ static void ib_policy_change_task(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  		rdma_for_each_port (dev, i) {
>  			u64 sp;
> -			int ret = ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix(dev,
> -							      i,
> -							      &sp);
> -
> -			WARN_ONCE(ret,
> -				  "ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix err: %d, this should never happen here\n",
> -				  ret);
> -			if (!ret)
> -				ib_security_cache_change(dev, i, sp);
> +
> +			ib_get_cached_subnet_prefix(dev, i, &sp);
> +
> +			ib_security_cache_change(dev, i, sp);

nitpick, the blank line is not needed.

Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>