[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMCRu+n23higbEcp@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:02:35 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
Cc: Larry.Finger@...inger.net, straube.linux@...il.com,
kaixuxia@...cent.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: replace two ODM_RT_TRACE calls in
hal/phy.c
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 12:56:09AM +0100, Phillip Potter wrote:
> Within rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust function, retrieve the struct
> net_device pointer, and replace both calls to the ODM_RT_TRACE macro
> with equivalent netdev_dbg calls, as well as modifying layout, wording
> and spacing slightly. The purpose of this, and patches like it, is to
> eventually remove the need for include/odm_debug.h, which is an overly
> complex way of printing debug/tracing information about the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/phy.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/phy.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/phy.c
> index a664bff370bb..a8caf618f588 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/phy.c
> @@ -301,11 +301,12 @@ void rtl88eu_dm_txpower_track_adjust(struct odm_dm_struct *dm_odm, u8 type,
> u8 *direction, u32 *out_write_val)
> {
> u8 pwr_value = 0;
> + struct net_device *pnetdev = dm_odm->Adapter->pnetdev;
> +
> /* Tx power tracking BB swing table. */
> if (type == 0) { /* For OFDM adjust */
> - ODM_RT_TRACE(dm_odm, ODM_COMP_TX_PWR_TRACK, ODM_DBG_LOUD,
> - ("BbSwingIdxOfdm = %d BbSwingFlagOfdm=%d\n",
> - dm_odm->BbSwingIdxOfdm, dm_odm->BbSwingFlagOfdm));
> + netdev_dbg(pnetdev, "%s(): BbSwingIdxOfdm = %d BbSwingFlagOfdm = %d\n",
> + __func__, dm_odm->BbSwingIdxOfdm, dm_odm->BbSwingFlagOfdm);
Along with what Dan said, please note that the dev_dbg() and
netdev_dbg() calls allow the user to see the function where the message
came from automatically, so there's never a need to add a __func__
string in the output.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists