lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 19:16:55 +0800 From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com> To: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> CC: moyufeng <moyufeng@...wei.com>, Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "michal.lkml@...kovi.net" <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, "lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@...wei.com>, Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>, "shenjian15@...wei.com" <shenjian15@...wei.com>, "chenhao (DY)" <chenhao288@...ilicon.com>, Jiaran Zhang <zhangjiaran@...wei.com>, "linuxarm@...neuler.org" <linuxarm@...neuler.org> Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/8] Introducing subdev bus and devlink extension On 2021/6/9 17:52, Parav Pandit wrote: > >> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 5:41 PM > >> >> Is there any reason why VF use its own devlink instance? > Because devlink instance gives the ability for the VF and SF to control itself. > (a) device parameters (devlink dev param show) > (b) resources of the device > (c) health reporters > (d) reload in net ns > > There knobs (a) to (c) etc are not for the hypervisor to control. These are mainly for the VF/SF users to manage its own device. Do we need to disable user from changing the net ns in a container? >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists