[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210609113903.1421-25-vbabka@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:38:53 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: [RFC v2 24/34] mm, slub: detach whole partial list at once in unfreeze_partials()
Instead of iterating through the live percpu partial list, detach it from the
kmem_cache_cpu at once. This is simpler and will allow further optimization.
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
---
mm/slub.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index dcbc5baea702..3e0ec7211d55 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2298,16 +2298,20 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s,
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
struct kmem_cache_node *n = NULL, *n2 = NULL;
- struct page *page, *discard_page = NULL;
+ struct page *page, *partial_page, *discard_page = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
- while ((page = slub_percpu_partial(c))) {
+ partial_page = slub_percpu_partial(c);
+ c->partial = NULL;
+
+ while (partial_page) {
struct page new;
struct page old;
- slub_set_percpu_partial(c, page);
+ page = partial_page;
+ partial_page = page->next;
n2 = get_node(s, page_to_nid(page));
if (n != n2) {
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists