[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548dd463-3942-00a1-85c3-232897dea1a3@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:50:07 +0100
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: "Hans de Goede <hdegoede"@redhat.com,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Computation of return value being discarded in get_cpu_power() in
drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c
Hi,
I was reviewing some old unassigned variable warnings from static
analysis by Coverity and found an issue introduced with the following
commit:
commit aa7ffc01d254c91a36bf854d57a14049c6134c72
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Date: Fri May 14 15:41:14 2010 -0700
x86 platform driver: intelligent power sharing driver
The analysis is as follows:
drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c
871 static u32 get_cpu_power(struct ips_driver *ips, u32 *last, int period)
872 {
873 u32 val;
874 u32 ret;
875
876 /*
877 * CEC is in joules/65535. Take difference over time to
878 * get watts.
879 */
880 val = thm_readl(THM_CEC);
881
882 /* period is in ms and we want mW */
883 ret = (((val - *last) * 1000) / period);
Unused value (UNUSED_VALUE)
assigned_value: Assigning value from ret * 1000U / 65535U to ret here,
but that stored value is not used.
884 ret = (ret * 1000) / 65535;
885 *last = val;
886
887 return 0;
888 }
I'm really not sure why ret is being calculated on lines 883,884 and not
being used. Should that be *last = ret on line 885? Looks suspect anyhow.
Colin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists