linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regmap: mdio: Reject invalid clause-22 addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3328306a4d5b4f8f58b3b8666eeccac714440da8.camel@svanheule.net>
Date:   Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:51:18 +0200
From:   Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: mdio: Reject invalid clause-22 addresses

Hi Mark,

On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 12:03 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> > Currently a regmap configuration for regmap-mdio must have a register
> > address width of 5 bits (cf. clause-22 register access). This is not
> > enforced on the provided register addresses, which would enable
> > clause-45 MDIO bus access, if the right bit packing is used.
> 
> Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes
> it hard to follow what's going on and what the current state of things
> is and makes it easy for things to get missed when threads get cleaned
> out.

It appears that this has caused you to merge the RFC patches instead. I've
posted two new patches, to bring the code in line with the discussion on the
original RFC patches. See:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1623238313.git.sander@svanheule.net/

My apologies for the extra work this has caused.

Best,
Sander