[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210609125241.GA1347@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:52:41 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Avihai Horon <avihaih@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Honggang LI <honli@...hat.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rdma-next] RDMA/mlx5: Enable Relaxed Ordering by
default for kernel ULPs
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 02:05:03PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Avihai Horon <avihaih@...dia.com>
>
> Relaxed Ordering is a capability that can only benefit users that support
> it. All kernel ULPs should support Relaxed Ordering, as they are designed
> to read data only after observing the CQE and use the DMA API correctly.
>
> Hence, implicitly enable Relaxed Ordering by default for kernel ULPs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avihai Horon <avihaih@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v2:
> * Dropped IB/core patch and set RO implicitly in mlx5 exactly like in
> eth side of mlx5 driver.
This looks great in terms of code changes. But can we please also add a
patch to document that PCIe relaxed ordering is fine for kernel ULP usage
somewhere?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists