linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "regmap: mdio: Add clause-45 support"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:23:02 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Adrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "regmap: mdio: Add clause-45 support"

On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 02:42:06PM +0200, Sander Vanheule wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 13:24 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> > subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> > Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
> > make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
> > There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.

> I had grepped the commit log for other reverting patches, which also appear to
> use this style, but I didn't check the regmap-specific ones.

There's nothing in submitting-patches.rst which says to skip the usual
process for reverts - the fact that people sometimes apply things with
non-ideal subject lines doesn't mean it's best practice.

> I'll submit a v2 that fixes __regmap_init_mdio, and also applies the address
> checks to C45 access.

OK.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)