linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 03/43] spi: Fix spi device unregister flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210610192608.GA31461@wunner.de>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:26:08 +0200
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 03/43] spi: Fix spi device unregister flow

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:22:40PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:55 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 01:10:28PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > >On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:06:53PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > >> From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > >>
> > >> [ Upstream commit c7299fea67696db5bd09d924d1f1080d894f92ef ]
> > >
> > >This commit shouldn't be backported to stable by itself, it requires
> > >that the following fixups are applied on top of it:
> > >
> > >* Upstream commit 27e7db56cf3d ("spi: Don't have controller clean up spi
> > >  device before driver unbind")
> > >
> > >* spi.git commit 2ec6f20b33eb ("spi: Cleanup on failure of initial setup")
> > >  https://git.kernel.org/broonie/spi/c/2ec6f20b33eb
> > >
> > >Note that the latter is queued for v5.13, but hasn't landed there yet.
> > >So you probably need to back out c7299fea6769 from the stable queue and
> > >wait for 2ec6f20b33eb to land in upstream.
> > >
> > >Since you've applied c7299fea6769 to v5.12, v5.10, v5.4, v4.14 and v4.19
> > >stable trees, the two fixups listed above need to be backported to all
> > >of them.
> >
> > I took those two patches into 5.12-5.4, but as they needed a more
> > complex backport for 4.14 and 4.19, I've dropped c7299fea67 from those
> > trees.
> 
> Sounds good. Also, there was a subsequent "Fixes" for this patch and I
> think another "Fixes" for the "Fixes". So, before picking this up,
> maybe make sure those Fixes patches are pickable too?

Aren't those the commits I've listed above?  Or did I miss any fixes?
I'm not aware of any others besides these two.

Thanks,

Lukas