linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/13] objtool: Rewrite hashtable sizing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABCJKudpajMRFGpn4Vh-JWzyfprEVrtYzX79iwp++rPu6rQWHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jun 2021 12:43:56 -0700
From:   Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] objtool: Rewrite hashtable sizing

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:33 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:50:36AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:14 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > Adding Sami because I am not sure why this patch would have much of an impact
> > > in relation to LTO. https://git.kernel.org/tip/25cf0d8aa2a3 is the patch in
> > > question.
> >
> > It's because LLVM enables -ffunction-sections with LTO, so using .text
> > section size to estimate the reloc hash table size isn't going to be
> > accurate, as confirmed by objtool output with --stats:
> >
> >   OBJTOOL vmlinux.o
> > nr_sections: 141481
> > section_bits: 17
> > nr_symbols: 215262
> > symbol_bits: 17
> > max_reloc: 24850
> > tot_reloc: 590890
> > reloc_bits: 10
>
> Bah. Would something like the *completely* untested below help with that?

Yes, that seems to work:

tot_reloc: 590890
reloc_bits: 19

Nathan, can you confirm if this fixes the regression for you?

Sami