[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMJvNGyIaBItV9c6@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 21:59:48 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/11] x86/x86: Add is_tdx_guest() interface
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 07:21:29PM -0700, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> +static int __ro_after_init tdx_guest = -1;
> +
> +static inline bool native_cpuid_has_tdx_guest(void)
> +{
> + u32 eax = TDX_CPUID_LEAF_ID, signature[3] = {0};
> +
> + if (native_cpuid_eax(0) < TDX_CPUID_LEAF_ID)
> + return false;
> +
> + native_cpuid(&eax, &signature[0], &signature[1], &signature[2]);
> +
> + if (memcmp("IntelTDX ", signature, 12))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
As before,
return !memcmp(...
and then that function can return simply an int.
> +}
> +
> +bool is_tdx_guest(void)
If anything, this should be early_is_tdx_guest().
> +{
> + if (tdx_guest < 0)
> + tdx_guest = native_cpuid_has_tdx_guest();
> +
> + return !!tdx_guest;
> +}
> +
Applying: x86/x86: Add is_tdx_guest() interface
.git/rebase-apply/patch:58: new blank line at EOF.
+
warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
> index 5b14b72e41c5..5e70617e9877 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,12 @@ static inline bool cpuid_has_tdx_guest(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> +bool is_tdx_guest(void)
> +{
> + return static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(is_tdx_guest);
I don't like this is_tdx_guest() thing in kernel proper - what's wrong
with
prot_guest_has(PR_GUEST_TDX)
?
Also, why is it exported, for kvm?
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists