lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C7AC6780-9DCE-4CE5-90B1-9AA0731341BF@psu.edu>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:20:31 +0000
From:   "Lin, Zhenpeng" <zplin@....edu>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:     Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: choose the right freelist pointer location when
 creating small caches

Sounds good. But I would suggest this to go to -stable as soon as possible. Because this bug is affecting the basic functionality of DCCP. It crashes kernel whenever a new socket in this module is created.

Best,
Zhenpeng

-----Original Message-----
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Date: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 at 7:14 PM
To: "Lin, Zhenpeng" <zplin@....edu>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub: choose the right freelist pointer location when creating small caches

    On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 07:06:45PM +0000, Lin, Zhenpeng wrote:
    > No problem. Just took a look and tested the patch, it looks good to me!

    Great; thank you! Sorry I dropped the ball on this series. I got
    distracted. :) It looks like akpm took it into -mm now, so this should
    be fixed in -next soon.

    -- 
    Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ