linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] dt-bindings: clk: versaclock5: Miscellaneous fixes and improvements:

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ec070c68-5b5e-0366-434e-9d9b571e95a8@lucaceresoli.net>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:33:38 +0200
From:   Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] dt-bindings: clk: versaclock5: Miscellaneous fixes and
 improvements:

Hi Geert, All,

On 10/06/21 09:09, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>   - Add missing "additionalProperties: false" for subnodes, to catch
>     typos in properties,
>   - Fix property names in example.
> 
> Fixes: 45c940184b501fc6 ("dt-bindings: clk: versaclock5: convert to yaml")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>

Thanks for resending.

In the meanwhile this patch has got shorter and shorter, and now I
realize it has now become identical (except for an empty line
difference) to patch "dt-bindings: clk: vc5: Fix example" send by Sean
Anderson on June 7 and Reviewed-by me yesterday.

To the maintainer: either one can be applied, it's technically
identical. If it were me I'd choose this one as it's out since way longer.

Thanks everybody for your patience.

-- 
Luca