linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add support for mt8195

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:50:17 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Chun-Jie Chen <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
        Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        "chun-jie.chen" <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add support for mt8195

Hi Chun-Jie,

Thanks for the patch, comments below.

On 10/06/2021 04:36, Chun-Jie Chen wrote:
> From: "chun-jie.chen" <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> 
> Add the needed board data to support mt8195 SoC.
> 

Please try to come up with a better commit message. Especially mention that we
have to increase the SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA.

> Signed-off-by: chun-jie.chen <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>

I suppose your name would be "Chun-Jie Chen"

Please also fix your git settings to that From and Signed-off-by matches.

[...]

>  
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> index 8b86ed22ca56..1b8967b9829e 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>  #define PWR_STATUS_AUDIO		BIT(24)
>  #define PWR_STATUS_USB			BIT(25)
>  
> -#define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA		5
> +#define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA		6
>  
>  #define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update, _ignore) {	\
>  		.bus_prot_mask = (_mask),			\
> @@ -72,8 +72,6 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
>  	bool ignore_clr_ack;
>  };
>  
> -#define MAX_SUBSYS_CLKS 10
> -

Good catch, not needed define. Can you put that in a new patch please?

Regards,
Matthias