lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL2Yj0T70SBPfHLz0GUn7C7PF=i9pS5JD7TzOJhRaNFQN3U0dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Jun 2021 11:18:44 +0200
From:   Piotr Górski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>
To:     Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Cc:     brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>,
        Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/8] bfq: introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg helper method

Tested-by: Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>

I have been testing this since the first release and have not noticed
any irregularities.

czw., 10 cze 2021 o 10:31 Oleksandr Natalenko
<oleksandr@...alenko.name> napisał(a):
>
> Hello.
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:22:30PM +0800, brookxu wrote:
> > From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
> >
> > Introduce bfq_entity_to_bfqg() to make it easier to obtain the
> > bfq_group corresponding to the entity.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
> > ---
> >  block/bfq-cgroup.c  |  6 ++----
> >  block/bfq-iosched.h |  1 +
> >  block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 16 ++++++++++++----
> >  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bfq-cgroup.c b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> > index b791e20..a5f544a 100644
> > --- a/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> > +++ b/block/bfq-cgroup.c
> > @@ -309,8 +309,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfqq_group(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
> >  {
> >       struct bfq_entity *group_entity = bfqq->entity.parent;
> >
> > -     return group_entity ? container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group,
> > -                                        entity) :
> > +     return group_entity ? bfq_entity_to_bfqg(group_entity) :
> >                             bfqq->bfqd->root_group;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -610,8 +609,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_find_set_group(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
> >        */
> >       entity = &bfqg->entity;
> >       for_each_entity(entity) {
> > -             struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg = container_of(entity,
> > -                                             struct bfq_group, entity);
> > +             struct bfq_group *curr_bfqg = bfq_entity_to_bfqg(entity);
> >               if (curr_bfqg != bfqd->root_group) {
> >                       parent = bfqg_parent(curr_bfqg);
> >                       if (!parent)
> > diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h
> > index b8e793c..a6f98e9 100644
> > --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h
> > +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h
> > @@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ struct bfq_group {
> >  #endif
> >
> >  struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq(struct bfq_entity *entity);
> > +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg(struct bfq_entity *entity);
> >
> >  /* --------------- main algorithm interface ----------------- */
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bfq-wf2q.c b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> > index 070e34a..5ff0028 100644
> > --- a/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> > +++ b/block/bfq-wf2q.c
> > @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ struct bfq_group *bfq_bfqq_to_bfqg(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
> >       if (!group_entity)
> >               group_entity = &bfqq->bfqd->root_group->entity;
> >
> > -     return container_of(group_entity, struct bfq_group, entity);
> > +     return bfq_entity_to_bfqg(group_entity);
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static bool bfq_no_longer_next_in_service(struct bfq_entity *entity)
> >       if (bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity))
> >               return true;
> >
> > -     bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity);
> > +     bfqg = bfq_entity_to_bfqg(entity);
> >
> >       /*
> >        * The field active_entities does not always contain the
> > @@ -266,6 +266,15 @@ struct bfq_queue *bfq_entity_to_bfqq(struct bfq_entity *entity)
> >       return bfqq;
> >  }
> >
> > +struct bfq_group *bfq_entity_to_bfqg(struct bfq_entity *entity)
> > +{
> > +     struct bfq_group *bfqg = NULL;
> > +
> > +     if (entity->my_sched_data)
> > +             bfqg = container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity);
> > +
> > +     return bfqg;
> > +}
> >
> >  /**
> >   * bfq_delta - map service into the virtual time domain.
> > @@ -1001,8 +1010,7 @@ static void __bfq_activate_entity(struct bfq_entity *entity,
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_BFQ_GROUP_IOSCHED
> >       if (!bfq_entity_to_bfqq(entity)) { /* bfq_group */
> > -             struct bfq_group *bfqg =
> > -                     container_of(entity, struct bfq_group, entity);
> > +             struct bfq_group *bfqg = bfq_entity_to_bfqg(entity);
> >               struct bfq_data *bfqd = bfqg->bfqd;
> >
> >               if (!entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) {
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
> If it is a resend only, I can offer my Tested-by since I'm running this
> series for quite some time already.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>   Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ