[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMH9wqUnjudiAVlr@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:55:46 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Muralidhara M K <muralimk@....com>,
Akshay Gupta <Akshay.Gupta@....com>,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@...el.com>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/mce: Add support for Extended Physical Address
MCA changes
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 05:10:12PM -0500, Smita Koralahalli wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
> index f71435e53cdb..480a497877e2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/amd.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(smca_banks);
> #define MAX_MCATYPE_NAME_LEN 30
> static char buf_mcatype[MAX_MCATYPE_NAME_LEN];
>
> +struct smca_config {
> + __u64 lsb_in_status : 1,
> + __reserved_0 : 63;
> +};
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct smca_config[MAX_NR_BANKS], smca_cfg);
Per CPU and per bank, huh? For a single bit?
Even if we have
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank[MAX_NR_BANKS], mce_banks_array);
already?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists